Free Hamlet Essays: Not Murder, Self Defense in Hamlet :: GCSE English Literature Coursework

Not Murder, Self Defense in Hamlet It is said that fall of the Royal family of Denmark, was Prince Hamlets fault. But in truth, Hamlet wasn't responsible for all the deaths. He was simply just avenging his fathers murder, an of Gertrude, Polonius, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, and Ophelia. If you don't know who you are killing, are you held fully responsible for the murder? In Hamlets case, he promised his father, he would avenge his fathers murder. After the play, Hamlet was called into Gertrudes room to have a talk with his mother. That evening, Hamlet had performed badley and embarrassed King Claudius by implying that he had killed King Hamlet. At this point in the play, Hamlet was aware that almost everyone was spying on him. So he had reason to be suspicious when he heard a noise from behind a curtain. It was of course Hamlets fault that he had stabbed Polonius, but Hamlet wasn't aware that it was Polonius. He thought that it was Claudius getting ready to pull a knife on him, so as self-defense, Hamlet killed him. Polonius was just mistaken for the King. He was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Therefore Because Hamlet wasn't aware he was killing the wrong person, he can't be fully responsible for Polonius's death. After Hamlet realized that he had murd ered the Kings advisor, not the king, he felt sorry for Polonius and sort of apologized. "thou wretched, rash, intruding fool, farewell. I took thee for thy better. Take thy fortune. Thou find'st to be too busy in some danger." ( Act 3 scene 4, line 38) Everyone deals with death differently. Hamlet mourns, promising to get even. Gertrude starts new with a new husband to replace the old one. When Ophelia hears about her fathers death, she goes mad. That is how Ophelia deals with death. She turned crazy; acting insane like a mad woman. Soon she got to the point where she couldn't control her actions. As a result, she herself decided to end her life, to end the madness and pain. Ophelia's death was caused because of her fathers death. Because Hamlet was not fully responsible for the death of Polonius, he couldn't be responsible for the death of Ophelia. Hamlet loved Ophelia; he wouldn't deliberately hurt her like that. "I loved Ophelia. Forty thousand brothers could not with all their quantity of love make up my sum.

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Abraham Lincoln once said, â€Å"I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the way of a whole human being. † I couldn’t agree more with this statement as I do not believe that animal testing is right and I am totally against it. One of the main reasons I am against animal testing is the fact that the animals don’t have a choice and are being forced to be tested, which can lead to them getting seriously ill or dying as a cause of the testing.Each year in the USA alone, an estimate of 70 million animals are taken away from their natural habitat, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and basically hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centres. That is not right in my opinion and I don’t particularly see how it can be right in any morally correct human being’s opinion. So man y animals experience pain or suffering and can do nothing about it, they are powerless in these situations and that is not fair, it’s not right.According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12, 000 animals, that statistic angers me and makes me fear for the potentially affected animals if these tests are to continue. To think that some of these tests are for cosmetic products such as make-up, nail varnish etc. leads me to believe that all the pain and suffering caused isn’t necessary and could be reduced to an extent, if not eradicated. If the animals can’t make the choice, then we can’t make the choice for them.Another one of the main reasons I am against animal testing is the undeniable fact that there is alternatives. In this day in age there is no morally decent reason for animal testing to continue as it causes too much pain and suffering for animals all over the world. We should use these alternatives, for example, some scientists are using synthetic skin to measure how drugs travel through the skin of a human, and other scientists are using human cell structures and cultures to test how drugs work, these alternatives  should be used to replace the laws that require mandatory drug and cosmetic testing on animals.I hope that the United Kingdom provide the necessary funding for alternatives such as the ones I just mentioned to replace the current animal testing system. Furthermore, I hope that the whole world changes their laws to replace animal testing with these alternatives as it would benefit so many animals globally, without effect human beings. Why should animal testing continue when it could be prevented and replaced?Does the government want these animals to die? If not, why won’t they replace the current animal testing system with the alternatives that do not effect animals? I think it’s because they are too concerned with t heir own wealth, or else they would not allow this pain and suffering to continue. Nevertheless, there is always two sides to an argument and an obvious one is that animal testing helps researchers to find drugs and treatments, it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine.Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer treatment and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. Those are great findings and have been extremely helpful to humans yet there are still flaws to this point as there is other methods that can be used to discover these drugs and treatments, they don’t necessarily have to be discovered via animal testing, which a lot of the time results in those animals dying with no new discovery found. It is irrational and unnecessary to use animals as a means to an end.It can be prevented. To conclude, I feel that animal testing is not right and I am against the current animal testin g system, which is mandatory by law. I think the fact that the animals don’t have a choice and are being forced to be tested, which puts their life in danger, is wrong. I also believe that animal testing is the wrong thing to do when there are many alternatives that would cause no harm to animals (or humans). Jeremy Bentham once said, â€Å"The question is not, â€Å"Can they reason? † nor, â€Å"Can they talk? † but â€Å"Can they suffer? † – The answer is simple.

Ways to Take Action against Child Labour - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 553 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/04/15 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Child Labour Essay Did you like this example? Analysis of the situation: Obtain information from the Ministry of Labour on the national law regulating employment of children, more specifically: Provisions regarding the minimum age for employment that will enable you to meet legal requirements. A hazardous child labour list that will enable you to revise the tasks for children above the minimum working age and reassign them to work in safe, non-hazardous conditions while securing their access to appropriate education or training. Reliable techniques to check age include the following: Medical examination prior to employment. Multiple written documents and affidavits. Culturally sensitive interviews with employees and applicants who appear to be too young. End of compulsory schooling certificate for those above minimum age. School enrolment certificate for those in light work. Guidance for governments (and social partners) on work that may be hazardous for children, and could therefore be included on a national list, is given in the ILOs Worst Forms of Child Labour Recommendation, 1999 (No. 190), Paragraph 3: In determining the types of work referred to under Article 3(d) of the Convention [No. 182], and in identifying where they exist, consideration should be given, inter alia, to: Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Ways to Take Action against Child Labour" essay for you Create order (a) Work which exposes children to physical, psychological or sexual abuse. (b) Work underground, under water, at dangerous heights or in confined spaces. (c) Work with dangerous machinery, equipment and tools, or which involves the manual handling or transport of heavy loads. (d) Work in an unhealthy environment which may, for example, expose children to hazardous substances, agents or processes, or to temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health. (e) Work under particularly difficult conditions such as work for long hours or during the night or work where the child is unreasonably confined to the premises of the employer. Immediate actions: Immediately stop hiring children below the relevant minimum age. This does not mean you cannot recruit workers above the minimum age into decent youth employment. But there should be a permanent ban on underage recruitment. This should be understood by all employees responsible for hiring. Control the risks identified through a workplace risk assessment. Young employees (i.e. those of legal working age) could perform the same tasks in the same workplace if those risks are reduced or removed. Remove children from tasks and environments that are dangerous for them but not for adults (e.g. heavy loads, night work, heavy machinery) Strategic actions: Set an occupational safety and health policy (a written form stating the companys objectives and commitment to protect the safety and health of all workers) with full participation of workers. Allocate responsibilities, accountability and authority for safety and health activities in the workplace. Plan the provision of skills and organization of the system including resource allocation. Plan risk assessment. Put the occupational safety and health program into action. Measure how your occupational safety and health policy affects your business and how workers respond to it. Review the system. Get the system ready for the next cycle. Monitoring: Internal auditing: A system in which the company inspects itself. Also known as first-party auditing, it is the easiest to manage but may lack credibility. External auditing: An external organization inspects your companys worksites or, more commonly, those of your suppliers. Their audits will be more trustworthy if this organization has a good reputation and has received full training on child labour.